|
Ashish Thusoo
2010-10-22, 21:51
John Sichi
2010-10-22, 21:54
Alex Boisvert
2010-10-22, 22:02
Namit Jain
2010-10-22, 22:03
Namit Jain
2010-10-22, 22:03
yongqiang he
2010-10-22, 22:10
Ning Zhang
2010-10-22, 22:11
Ashish Thusoo
2010-10-22, 22:34
Carl Steinbach
2010-10-22, 22:35
Joydeep Sen Sarma
2010-10-22, 23:16
Edward Capriolo
2010-10-22, 23:16
S. Venkatesh
2010-10-23, 07:02
Zheng Shao
2010-10-24, 18:23
Edward Capriolo
2010-10-24, 21:16
Ashish Thusoo
2010-10-25, 21:18
Alan Gates
2010-10-25, 21:55
Carl Steinbach
2010-10-26, 03:40
Ashish Thusoo
2010-10-26, 17:40
Ashish Thusoo
2010-10-28, 01:28
|
-
[VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAshish Thusoo 2010-10-22, 21:51
Hi Folks,
I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectJohn Sichi 2010-10-22, 21:54
Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :)
JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project > > https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html > > These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. > > We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. > > +1 from me.. > > Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAlex Boisvert 2010-10-22, 22:02
+1 (non-binding, as Hive user).
alex On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:54 PM, John Sichi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) > > JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html > > > > These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that > were recently proposed by Alan Gates. > > > > We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws > to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, > contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will > be binding. > > > > +1 from me.. > > > > Ashish > >
-
RE: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectNamit Jain 2010-10-22, 22:03
)))
. All Hive users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding From: Ashish Thusoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
-
RE: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectNamit Jain 2010-10-22, 22:03
+1
From: Ashish Thusoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 2:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Projectyongqiang he 2010-10-22, 22:10
+1
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Namit Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > > > > > From: Ashish Thusoo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 2:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html > > > > These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were > recently proposed by Alan Gates. > > > > We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to > pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, > contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will > be binding. > > > > +1 from me.. > > > > Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectNing Zhang 2010-10-22, 22:11
+1
On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAshish Thusoo 2010-10-22, 22:34
I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :)
Ashish Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) > > JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> >> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >> Project >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >> >> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >> >> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig >> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >> only PMC votes will be binding. >> >> +1 from me.. >> >> Ashish >
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectCarl Steinbach 2010-10-22, 22:35
"Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project
development mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hive PMC mailing list." It would be good if the "Actions" table included a column specifying which mailing list each type of vote should occur on. Also, at the first contributors meeting there was a discussion about the process for becoming a committer and whether or not people would be notified that they have been nominated, and hence know if they're nomination was later rejected. If these votes are going to take place on the PMC list I think it's important for this provision to appear in the bylaws. Thanks. Carl On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ning Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project > > https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html > > These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that > were recently proposed by Alan Gates. > > We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws > to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, > contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will > be binding. > > +1 from me.. > > Ashish > > >
-
RE: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectJoydeep Sen Sarma 2010-10-22, 23:16
Under 'Code change', 'Binding votes says
Lazy approval (not counting the vote of the contributor) But Lazy Approval says it's an action that that is implicitly allowed except for -1. I guess the Code change rule wants to say one +1 is required - but that's not very clear. Maybe Lazy Approval wants to say at least 1 +1 required other than contributor/person in question? ________________________________ From: Carl Steinbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 3:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project "Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project development mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hive PMC mailing list." It would be good if the "Actions" table included a column specifying which mailing list each type of vote should occur on. Also, at the first contributors meeting there was a discussion about the process for becoming a committer and whether or not people would be notified that they have been nominated, and hence know if they're nomination was later rejected. If these votes are going to take place on the PMC list I think it's important for this provision to appear in the bylaws. Thanks. Carl On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ning Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: +1 On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectEdward Capriolo 2010-10-22, 23:16
Good point about knowing which list to vote on. As for the voting new
committers, it would be very hard for me to imagine a nominee being rejected. I would not call it a formality, but essentially the only criteria is having x patches. (Its not dancing with the stars :) Ed On Friday, October 22, 2010, Carl Steinbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary project development mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>). Where necessary, PMC voting may take place on the private Hive PMC mailing list." > > It would be good if the "Actions" table included a column specifying which mailing list each type of vote should occur on. Also, at the first contributors meeting there was a discussion about the process for becoming a committer and whether or not people would be notified that they have been nominated, and hence know if they're nomination was later rejected. If these votes are going to take place on the PMC list I think it's important for this provision to appear in the bylaws. > > Thanks. > > Carl > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Ning Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 > > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html > > > These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. > > > We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. > > > > +1 from me.. > > > Ashish > > > > > > > > > > >
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectS. Venkatesh 2010-10-23, 07:02
+1
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectZheng Shao 2010-10-24, 18:23
+1
On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) > > Ashish > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) >> >> JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >> >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >>> Project >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >>> >>> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >>> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >>> >>> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >>> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig >>> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >>> only PMC votes will be binding. >>> >>> +1 from me.. >>> >>> Ashish >>
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectEdward Capriolo 2010-10-24, 21:16
+1
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) >> >> Ashish >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) >>> >>> JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >>>> Project >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >>>> >>>> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >>>> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >>>> >>>> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >>>> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig >>>> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >>>> only PMC votes will be binding. >>>> >>>> +1 from me.. >>>> >>>> Ashish >>> >
-
RE: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAshish Thusoo 2010-10-25, 21:18
I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the committer pipeline.
Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval as one +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a committer +1s a change and commits it. Alan, how is pig addressing this? Ashish ________________________________________ From: Edward Capriolo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project +1 On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) >> >> Ashish >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) >>> >>> JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Folks, >>>> >>>> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >>>> Project >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >>>> >>>> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >>>> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >>>> >>>> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >>>> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig >>>> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >>>> only PMC votes will be binding. >>>> >>>> +1 from me.. >>>> >>>> Ashish >>> >
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAlan Gates 2010-10-25, 21:55
On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's > suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the > committer pipeline. > > Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval > as one +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a > committer +1s a change and commits it. > > Alan, how is pig addressing this? Pig requires a +1 from a committer (or an additional committer if a committer contributed the code) in the code change case. I didn't do the best job of capturing that in the table, but that has been and continues to be the practice in the our community. On the votes for committer, I am fairly certain that PMC members are barred from disclosing that people are being voted on. I would recommend checking with the Apache board before you open up this information. Alan. > > Ashish > ________________________________________ > From: Edward Capriolo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project > > +1 > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) >>> >>> Ashish >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) >>>> >>>> JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) >>>> >>>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>> >>>>> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >>>>> Project >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >>>>> >>>>> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >>>>> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >>>>> >>>>> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >>>>> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All >>>>> Pig >>>>> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >>>>> only PMC votes will be binding. >>>>> >>>>> +1 from me.. >>>>> >>>>> Ashish >>>> >>
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectCarl Steinbach 2010-10-26, 03:40
+1
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: > > I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's >> suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the >> committer pipeline. >> >> Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval as one >> +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a committer +1s a >> change and commits it. >> >> Alan, how is pig addressing this? >> > Pig requires a +1 from a committer (or an additional committer if a > committer contributed the code) in the code change case. I didn't do the > best job of capturing that in the table, but that has been and continues to > be the practice in the our community. > > On the votes for committer, I am fairly certain that PMC members are barred > from disclosing that people are being voted on. I would recommend checking > with the Apache board before you open up this information. > > Alan. > > > >> Ashish >> ________________________________________ >> From: Edward Capriolo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project >> >> +1 >> >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) >>>> >>>> Ashish >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) >>>>> >>>>> JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive >>>>>> Project >>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html >>>>>> >>>>>> These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws >>>>>> that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. >>>>>> >>>>>> We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these >>>>>> bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig >>>>>> users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though >>>>>> only PMC votes will be binding. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 from me.. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ashish >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
-
RE: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAshish Thusoo 2010-10-26, 17:40
I have also added the clarification on the approval process for code changes.
So far we have 6 binding +1s and 4 non-binding +1s There are no -1s The vote will be open till tomorrow 3:00 pm, so if you have not got in your vote, please do so. Thanks, Ashish ________________________________ From: Carl Steinbach [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project +1 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the committer pipeline. Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval as one +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a committer +1s a change and commits it. Alan, how is pig addressing this? Pig requires a +1 from a committer (or an additional committer if a committer contributed the code) in the code change case. I didn't do the best job of capturing that in the table, but that has been and continues to be the practice in the our community. On the votes for committer, I am fairly certain that PMC members are barred from disclosing that people are being voted on. I would recommend checking with the Apache board before you open up this information. Alan. Ashish ________________________________________ From: Edward Capriolo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project +1 On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: +1 On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) Ashish Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish
-
Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive ProjectAshish Thusoo 2010-10-28, 01:28
With 10 +1s ad 0 -1s this vote passes.
Thanks, Ashish On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: I have also added the clarification on the approval process for code changes. So far we have 6 binding +1s and 4 non-binding +1s There are no -1s The vote will be open till tomorrow 3:00 pm, so if you have not got in your vote, please do so. Thanks, Ashish ________________________________ From: Carl Steinbach [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project +1 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Alan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: I have added the mailing lists to the document on Carl and Ed's suggestion. I am not sure if we should make public on who is in the committer pipeline. Joy's point is valid - should we explicitly call out lazy approval as one +1. It is expected that nothing would get committed unless a committer +1s a change and commits it. Alan, how is pig addressing this? Pig requires a +1 from a committer (or an additional committer if a committer contributed the code) in the code change case. I didn't do the best job of capturing that in the table, but that has been and continues to be the practice in the our community. On the votes for committer, I am fairly certain that PMC members are barred from disclosing that people are being voted on. I would recommend checking with the Apache board before you open up this information. Alan. Ashish ________________________________________ From: Edward Capriolo [[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bylaws for Apache Hive Project +1 On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Zheng Shao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: +1 On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Ashish Thusoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: I knew I was going to miss a pig somewhere... :) Ashish Sent from my iPhone On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:55 PM, "John Sichi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Hive users etc are encouraged to vote too :) JVS (gotta love cut-and-paste) On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ashish Thusoo wrote: Hi Folks, I propose that we adopt the following bylaws for the Apache Hive Project https://cwiki.apache.org/HIVE/bylaws.html These are basically a cut-and-paste job of the Apache Pig bylaws that were recently proposed by Alan Gates. We will keep the vote open for 6 business days. In order for these bylaws to pass we require +1 votes from 2/3 of PMC members. All Pig users, contributors, committers are encouraged to vote, though only PMC votes will be binding. +1 from me.. Ashish |