Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Snapshots branch trunk merging


+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:12
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-12, 23:42
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-13, 00:59
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-13, 01:30
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 23:45
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-02-12, 22:19
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 22:23
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:27
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Snapshots branch trunk merging
I created https://reviews.apache.org/r/9416/ for review comments.

Cheers

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> We did a branch merge of the snapshot branch (hbase-6055 and
> hbase-7290 combined) with trunk on 2/1/13.  This merge initially had
> several always broken tests but  since then Ted, Matteo and myself
> fixed all the always-broken unit tests.  I've merged again today
> 2/12/13 [1], and posted a patch on HBASE-7290 for the hadoopqa bot to
> run.
>
> There are primarily four of us who worked on this branch -- Jesse Y,
> Matteo, Ted Yu and myself, so if we each +1, technically we would have
> the 3 +1's required and could merge.  I wanted to solicit +1's from
> the four who worked  on it (all committers now) and also find out if
> anyone else has started reviewing the code or intends to in the next
> few days.  It is a large patch (1.3MB) that I can post on review
> board, but it may be easier to understand by going to the different
> individual jiras (some of which have design docs).   Generally we've
> been using a looser of review then commit for each of the subtasks. If
> I get clean test runs from the QA bot and +1's from the folks who
> worked on it or planned on reviewing it, I'd like merge sooner rather
> than later.
>
> On the unit testing front, I've personally gotten one error-free unit
> tests runs runs and one with a failure in hbase-examples:
>
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.example.TestBulkDeleteProtocol.testBulkDeleteFamily.
>
> On the system testing side, I've been testing the pre-merge version
> outlined by Aleks [2] and it had been fairly robust on a 5 node
> cluster with fault injection.  I've also done some testing on a 20
> node cluster (no fault injection) and a few runs on a 100 node cluster
> where the snapshoting feature has been robust.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon.
>
> [1] https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/snapshot-merge-0212
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/pdbkq654ipuxyt6a
>
> --
> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-13, 00:40
+
Stack 2013-02-13, 06:41
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-14, 14:44
+
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-20, 20:03
+
Jesse Yates 2013-02-20, 21:50
+
Lars Hofhansl 2013-02-13, 04:00