Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Drill >> mail # dev >> Next steps on the REST API

Copy link to this message
Re: Next steps on the REST API

   - I've created this JIRA for the DrillClient
   We could discuss the design further on JIRA too.
   - For the Singleton solution I've created a class called
   DrillClientProxy that wraps a single DrillClient instance.
   - As far as the localhost assumption goes what I am taking away is the
   DrillClient will be able to figure things out itself with the configuration
   its been given. The http layer need not do anything special.


On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Any thoughts on this?
> Sorry,  you response was sitting in a draft...
> >    - Is there any overhead to instantiating a new DrillClient, connecting
> >    to a drillbit and closing the connection per http request? Jersey
> creates a
> >    new instance of the Resource class for each request and the
> DrillClient
> >    will get instantiated per request unless we make it a static variable.
> You probably should avoid this. It will increase latency as the
> DrillClient is a treadsafe  resource that uses ZooKeeper to find
> Drillbits.
> >    - I am assuming that the DrillClient which will be instantiated from
> the
> >    http layer will always connect to the co-located/localhost Drillbit
> I don't think you need to assume this.  It may run locally or on a
> different node.  DrillClient should figure things out and make sure
> that everything runs well.
> >
> > With respect to the DrillClient we'll need the following methods to
> support
> > the async style interaction. If we agree to supporting this design I'll
> > create a JIRA for this -
> >
> >    - new DrillClient().submitQuery(QueryType, Query String) that returns
> >    the *QueryId* *and continues to execute in the background*
> >    - new DrillClient().getStatus(queryId) that returns a Status object.
> It
> >    could just return *IN_PROGRESS, SUCCEEDED and FAILED* for now. And
> some
> >    way to know why it failed in case it did.
> >    - new DrillClient().getResults(queryId) that returns
> > *QueryResultBatch*as it is doing now.
> >
> I think these make sense.  Parts of this are already stubbed out in
> the interface.  I don't want to maintain this kind of state on the
> server but within a particular approach to the Drill client is fine.
> I think this would be helpful for multiple consumers.  Put together a
> JIRA and we can work through the details further.
> One note that we can work out there: I think a paginated or continue
> interface might be better since the results come back in chunks.
> thanks,
> Jacques
> > While the api I've speced out above is the ideal one I guess this will
> > require more time and effort to implement it as suggested. Especially for
> > the getStatus and getResults methods as it implies that the state of a
> > query's lifecycle will be held/persisted by someone. Is the server
> already
> > maintaining some state for tracking the lifecycle of a query which can be
> > exposed?
> >
> > Hari