I think it makes sense to have 0.92 as the release for 0.20.205. There is no
real advantage in having an interim release with not many added features
just because there is a new Hadoop release out there that we think works
better. Also, it'll give time to test out stability of 0.20.205.
Just my $0.02...
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've been testing security features proposed for 0.92 with 0.20.205 with a
> patch to 205 to make testing easier (not needed for users). 0.92 is a good
> candidate to be "the release" for 0.20.205.
> Best regards,
> - Andy
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
> >From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 6:48 PM
> >Subject: Re: An HBase release that ships with 0.20.205?
> >Shall we wait for MAPREDUCE-3206 to be resolved ?
> >Meanwhile, let's work on 0.92
> >On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Hey devs,
> >> Now that 0.20.205 was finally released, I think we must hurry to get an
> >> HBase release that includes it. Should that be a special 0.90? Or 0.90
> >> recompiled with 0.20.205 that we call 0.91.205 or whatever? Or should we
> >> just continue focusing on 0.92 and ship with it?
> >> My concerns are:
> >> - Current situation where we ship with 0.20-append is just mad, it's
> >> even released. Need to fix this ASAP. I wonder how many potential users
> >> started installing HBase and just said "f**k this s**t" seeing that.
> >> - Compatibility with 0.20-append and plain 0.20.2, like if we move to
> >> 0.20.205 in 0.90 will it break everyone?
> >> - Stability... I haven't tested it so I don't know what to expect.
> >> be
> >> too bad tho.
> >> Thoughts and 0.02c welcome,
> >> J-D