Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HDFS >> mail # user >> Hadoop with S3 instead of local storage


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Hadoop with S3 instead of local storage
With S3 you do not need a NameNode. NameNode is part of HDFS.

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Alok Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Followed instructions from this link for setup
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/AmazonS3.
>
> my "core-site.xml " contains only these 3 properties :
> <property>
>   <name>fs.default.name</name>
>   <value>s3://BUCKET</value>
> </property>
>
> <property>
>   <name>fs.s3.awsAccessKeyId</name>
>   <value>ID</value>
> </property>
>
> <property>
>   <name>fs.s3.awsSecretAccessKey</name>
>   <value>SECRET</value>
> </property>
>
> hdfs-site.xml is empty!
>
> Namenode log says, its trying to connect to local HDFS not S3.
> Am i missing anything?
>
> Regards,
> Alok

--
Harsh J
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB