Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo, mail # dev - dependencies within 1.5


Copy link to this message
-
Re: dependencies within 1.5
Christopher 2013-05-21, 16:50
+1 for moving it in 1.5 for all the previous reasons specified.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think we should move it in 1.5. The bug Eric found this morning, along
>>
>
> Thats ok w/ me.  I mostly want to avoid the deprecation route.
>
>
>
>> with the laundry list of non-breakers, are enough for an RC5 to be cut.
>> This should be pulled in. Having packages not align with modules causes
>> nothing must frustration and confusion when trying to debug things.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think it's worth asking because a few people expressed interest in
>> > moving
>> > > the mini cluster to it's own module. Do we want this for 1.5 or do we
>> > wait
>> > > until 1.6 and provide a deprecation strategy?
>> > >
>> >
>> > I think we should move it in 1.5 XOR leave the package name the same in
>> > 1.6, but move it to another module.  Either way avoids API changes for
>> > users.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Agreed, they also slow down the build.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Maybe...  or 'jar-with-dependencies' assembly, or something similar,
>> > > >> might be useful.
>> > > >> I'd probably argue for it to be in a de-activated profile, by
>> default,
>> > > >> though. Shaded jars can become problematic if people start using
>> them
>> > > >> as dependencies.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> > This may be far out into space- but how would you guys feel about
>> > > >> providing
>> > > >> > a shaded jar in the pom for a new mini module? This may make it
>> > easier
>> > > >> for
>> > > >> > users to run the mini accumulo cluster without hadoop/zookeeper
>> > > >> installed.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> ACCUMULO-1436 for fixing "provided" dependencies.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> --
>> > > >> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > > >> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Christopher <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> > You're right. I'm not sure why our internal dependencies would
>> be
>> > > >> >> > marked as provided... except maybe I made that mistake to try
>> to
>> > > deal
>> > > >> >> > with the mess of the 'copy-dependencies' stuff. That should be
>> > > fixed.
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > --
>> > > >> >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > > >> >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> >> >> Jim, accumulo-start is a provided dependency for all of the
>> > other
>> > > >> >> versions.
>> > > >> >> >> So when you list accumulo-server as a dependency, it does not
>> > pull
>> > > >> in
>> > > >> >> the
>> > > >> >> >> provided dependencies.
>> > > >> >> >>
>> > > >> >> >> This is sort of what I was getting at before, Chris. The
>> > provided
>> > > >> jars
>> > > >> >> >> don't get pulled in/referenced when they are marked as
>> provided.
>> > > For
>> > > >> >> >> external dependencies, that totally makes sense. But I don't
>> > know
>> > > >> why we
>> > > >> >> >> need to mark other accumulo parts as provided. I find it
>> > difficult
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> >> >> believe that that is a standard maven configuration. It is