Jonathan Coveney 2012-10-30, 20:36
Julien Le Dem 2012-10-30, 20:40
Rohini Palaniswamy 2012-10-30, 21:02
Cheolsoo Park 2012-10-30, 21:16
-Re: Are people ok with putting PIG-3017 into pig 11?
Jon Coveney 2012-10-30, 21:26
Awesome. Next step is a code review :)
On Oct 30, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> +1. Agree with Julien. Error on hitting Configuration's size limit is a
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Julien Le Dem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> To me in falls in the category of bug fixes we can add to an existing
>>> It is not adding any feature, it is fixing a bug/issue
>>> It is well understood and limited to a specific area of the code.
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> We have some scripts internally that have come up that are blocked on
>>>> and I can imagine as other shops continue to heavily use Pig, they may
>>>> well. It seems like an easy, non-invasive change and I already did the
>>>> work, but technically we've already branched. I consider it a bug fix,
>>>> though, since it can be a show stopper for a data scientist.
Russell Jurney 2012-10-31, 03:33