Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig >> mail # dev >> Are people ok with putting PIG-3017 into pig 11?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Are people ok with putting PIG-3017 into pig 11?
Awesome. Next step is a code review :)

On Oct 30, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Cheolsoo Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>
>> +1. Agree with Julien. Error on hitting Configuration's size limit is a
>> bug.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Julien Le Dem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> To me in falls in the category of bug fixes we can add to an existing
>>> version.
>>> It is not adding any feature, it is fixing a bug/issue
>>> It is well understood and limited to a specific area of the code.
>>> Julien
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> We have some scripts internally that have come up that are blocked on
>>> this,
>>>> and I can imagine as other shops continue to heavily use Pig, they may
>> as
>>>> well. It seems like an easy, non-invasive change and I already did the
>>>> work, but technically we've already branched. I consider it a bug fix,
>>>> though, since it can be a show stopper for a data scientist.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> Jon
>>>
>>