Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> Discussion on JIRA


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Discussion on JIRA
One upside to discussion on mailing list is that it is immune to
'Maintenance in progress' of JIRA which is ongoing at the moment.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Josh Elser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think it heavily depends on the quality and focus of the discussion.
> >
> > Like you said, if the conversation is focused, it's nice to have the
> > complete conversation present on that ticket.
> >
>
> Well, the article said "...if the information looks like it will be quickly
> convergent, then put it directly in the bug tracker; if it looks like it
> will be divergent, then a mailing...".
>
>
> >
> > However, very often, we all get sidetracked and start talking about 8
> > other things instead of what the ticket is actually about.
> >
> > Perhaps a good middle ground would be to move discussion to the mailing
> > list when it gets off topic, and when the discussion comes to some
> > consensus post back to the ticket with the link from mail-archives and a
> > general synopsis with what was agreed upon?
>
>
> I am not really sure at this point.  Seems like a good bit of advice we can
> take into consideration as we go forward..
>
>
> >
> >
> > On 10/29/13, 12:32 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
> >
> >> I saw someone posted the following link on HBASE ticket and I thought it
> >> was interesting.  I have participated and instigated long discussions on
> >> tickets that do not quickly converge.  It may be better if we moved
> these
> >> to the mailing list as the link suggest.
> >>
> >> http://producingoss.com/en/**bug-tracker-usage.html<
> http://producingoss.com/en/bug-tracker-usage.html>
> >>
> >> It would be nice to go to a ticket related a new 1.6.0 feature a year
> from
> >> now, read it, and get a clear understanding of what transpired (rather
> >> than
> >> be totally confused :).
> >>
> >> Keith
> >>
> >>
>