Christophe Taton 2013-04-15, 18:23
Doug Cutting 2013-04-15, 20:08
Scott Carey 2013-04-15, 19:46
Christophe Taton 2013-04-15, 21:21
-Re: Could specific records implement the generic API as well?
Doug Cutting 2013-04-15, 22:43
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Christophe Taton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you think it's a meaningful addition, I'm happy to make the change.
The two methods I wrote above could be added to SpecificRecordBase and
it could then be declared to implement GenericRecord.
I think GenericRecordBuilder could be used to build specific records
with a few additional changes:
- change the type of the 'record' field from GenericData.Record to
- replace the call to 'new GenericData.Record()' to
- add a constructor that accepts a GenericData instance, instead of
Then you could use new GenericRecordBuilder(SpecificData.get(),
schema) to create specific records.
Christophe Taton 2013-04-18, 20:18
Doug Cutting 2013-04-22, 20:19
Scott Carey 2013-04-16, 04:19
Christophe Taton 2013-04-16, 04:39
Christophe Taton 2013-04-17, 05:30
Pankaj Shroff 2013-04-17, 14:16