Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Sorting out issues for 0.96 for (eventual) release
What do these two things have to do with each other?

On Tuesday, January 8, 2013, Ted Yu wrote:

> bq. depends on other communities because quite a bit seems broken on JDK 7
> so I hear
>
> I have been running tests using 1.6.0_37 for trunk. Tests run smoothly so
> far.
>
> FYI
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > That said, I think we should make up a list of what people want to
> see
> > > in,
> > > > and what could/should be excluded after we find that consensus.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > High-level, we have had this discussion IMO ([3]).  Would you like to
> do
> > it
> > > again Andrew?
> > >
> > > Otherwise, I think folks need to bubble up critical issues (or strike
> > them
> > > down) and if any controversial, lets discuss them?
> > >
> >
> > Some time has elapsed since that discussion, I think we should do it
> again.
> >
> > For example, the notion of running on JDK 7 is new, and depends on other
> > communities because quite a bit seems broken on JDK 7 so I hear. The
> creep
> > of "-Djava.net.preferIPv4=true" among Hadoop ecosystem projects is also a
> > concern, and it bothers me that HDFS tests seem DOA without it on my dev
> > box, so this also isn't something we are going to be able to solve
> entirely
> > on our own. So while I think these are serious concerns, I have mixed
> > feelings about them being prerequisites for a 0.96 release.
> >
> > A bunch of hard thoughtful intermingled work is underway in RPC and HFile
> > and other places, so that we only need to do a "singularity" once. We
> > should do a feature based release for this, not a time based one, is my
> > opinion. As for everything else, setting a target and seeing what falls
> in
> > or out based on that is worth doing.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)