Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> HBase 0.96.0 performace


Copy link to this message
-
Re: HBase 0.96.0 performace
You can not send pictures to the list. Please post it on an external
website and provide the link here.
2013/11/25 Vladimir Rodionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Where is the picture, Jerry?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jerry He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Re-attach the performance comparison picture.
> >
> > [image: Inline image 1]
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The picture didn't go through.
> >>
> >> Correction: the comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and 0.96.1 was done by
> >> Nicolas Liochon. This was not done at EBay.
> >>
> >> In my talk, there was another comparison to show that MTTR improved a
> lot
> >> from 0.94 to 0.96 - this was done at EBay.
> >>
> >> When Stack cuts 0.96.1 RC0, you would get the list of JIRAs that
> >> contributed to the speedup from 0.96.0 to 0.96.1
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Jerry He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,  Ted, and hbase experts
> >> >
> >> > Below picture is a performance comparison between hbase 0.96.0 and
> >> 0.96.1,
> >> > shared by Ted Yu in China Hadoop Summit today. This perf testing is
> >> said to
> >> > be executed on ebay's real cluster.
> >> >
> >> > It is surprising 0.96.0 is such worse compared to 0.96.1 and even
> >> 0.94.14.
> >> >  Are these numbers official and the performance degradation true?
> What
> >> > patch in 0.96.1 fixed this?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>