You might want to look into bulk loading.
On May 28, 2011 9:47 AM, "Qing Yan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I realized myself RS flush to HDFS is not designed to do incremental
> changes. So there is no way around of WAL? man..just wish it can run a bit
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Qing Yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok, thanks for the explaination. so data loss is normal in this case.
>> Yeah , I did a "kill -9". I did wait till the RS get reassigned and
>> actually let process B keep retring over the night ..
>> Is WAL the only way to guarantee data safety in hbase? We want high
>> rate though.
>> Is there a middle ground? e.g. a sync operation to flush RS to HDFS will