I'm starting to like NetBeans ... after many years of Eclipse use. But
I don't want to stray from the standard code style.

There's a checkstyle plugin for NetBeans, but you'd probably have to
customize the templates for new comments. We could also enforce style
with the maven-checkstyle-plugin.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm starting to like NetBeans ... after many years of Eclipse use. But
> I don't want to stray from the standard code style.

There seems to be roughly 84,000 checkstyle errors in trunk (1.6) just
using mvn checkstyle:checkstyle. Would you know how to develop a
better checkstyle check designed for Accumulo's style?

Admittedly this is not a high priority but it would provide an
opportunity for people not familiar with the source code to make or
suggest patches.

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a checkstyle plugin for NetBeans, but you'd probably have to
> customize the templates for new comments. We could also enforce style
> with the maven-checkstyle-plugin.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm starting to like NetBeans ... after many years of Eclipse use. But
>> I don't want to stray from the standard code style.

I was unable to find a way to convert our Eclipse formatter to a
checkstyle file... but I suspect one could be created manually. I
think this would be good to do, if somebody has the time or patience,
so we can run it every build.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Medinets
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be roughly 84,000 checkstyle errors in trunk (1.6) just
> using mvn checkstyle:checkstyle. Would you know how to develop a
> better checkstyle check designed for Accumulo's style?
>
> Admittedly this is not a high priority but it would provide an
> opportunity for people not familiar with the source code to make or
> suggest patches.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There's a checkstyle plugin for NetBeans, but you'd probably have to
>> customize the templates for new comments. We could also enforce style
>> with the maven-checkstyle-plugin.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm starting to like NetBeans ... after many years of Eclipse use. But
>>> I don't want to stray from the standard code style.

There's also the maven-formatter-plugin [1] which looks both awesome and
incredibly powerful.

[1]: https://code.google.com/p/maven-java-formatter-plugin/
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I was unable to find a way to convert our Eclipse formatter to a
> checkstyle file... but I suspect one could be created manually. I
> think this would be good to do, if somebody has the time or patience,
> so we can run it every build.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Medinets
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There seems to be roughly 84,000 checkstyle errors in trunk (1.6) just
> > using mvn checkstyle:checkstyle. Would you know how to develop a
> > better checkstyle check designed for Accumulo's style?
> >
> > Admittedly this is not a high priority but it would provide an
> > opportunity for people not familiar with the source code to make or
> > suggest patches.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> There's a checkstyle plugin for NetBeans, but you'd probably have to
> >> customize the templates for new comments. We could also enforce style
> >> with the maven-checkstyle-plugin.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, David Medinets <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I'm starting to like NetBeans ... after many years of Eclipse use. But
> >>> I don't want to stray from the standard code style.
>

Good find. That might be especially useful for generated code... if we
wanted to make that more readable.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Mike Drob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's also the maven-formatter-plugin [1] which looks both awesome and
> incredibly powerful.
>
> [1]: https://code.google.com/p/maven-java-formatter-plugin/
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I was unable to find a way to convert our Eclipse formatter to a
>> checkstyle file... but I suspect one could be created manually. I
>> think this would be good to do, if somebody has the time or patience,
>> so we can run it every build.
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:27 PM, David Medinets
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > There seems to be roughly 84,000 checkstyle errors in trunk (1.6) just
>> > using mvn checkstyle:checkstyle. Would you know how to develop a
>> > better checkstyle check designed for Accumulo's style?
>> >
>> > Admittedly this is not a high priority but it would provide an
>> > opportunity for people not familiar with the source code to make or
>> > suggest patches.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >> There's a checkstyle plugin for NetBeans, but you'd probably have to
>> >> customize the templates for new comments. We could also enforce style
>> >> with the maven-checkstyle-plugin.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 9:26 PM, David Medinets <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>> I'm starting to like NetBeans ... after many years of Eclipse use. But
>> >>> I don't want to stray from the standard code style.
>>