Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:12
lars hofhansl 2013-02-12, 23:42
Ted Yu 2013-02-13, 00:59
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-13, 01:30
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 23:45
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-02-12, 22:19
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 22:23
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-12, 22:27
Ted Yu 2013-02-12, 23:28
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-13, 00:40
Stack 2013-02-13, 06:41
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-14, 14:44
Jonathan Hsieh 2013-02-20, 20:03
Make that 5 +1s - I'm good too.
- Jesse Yates
On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've got 4 +1's (jmhsieh, stack, tedyu, mbertozzi) on merging the
> hbase-7290v2 svn branch into trunk. I'll be merging it into trunk later
> tonight, and any follow on issues will be dealt with there.
> Thanks all,
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> I've successfully ported the git repo to an svn branch. The branch is
>> called hbase-7290v2 (I made some mistakes on v1). Here's a link to
>> what the svn snapshots repo looks like:
>> This is the official branch now -- we'll now commit fixes from the
>> pre-trunk-merge mega-patch reviews to that branch. Note that the
>> branch has also been straightened so that only merges from trunk come
>> in (on in branch merges). Because the svn branch is now the official
>> branch, I've made my personal repo at https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase
>> read-only by others again.
>> You can see from the current jmhsieh/snapshots github branch, I merged
>> it with the apache svn (from 2/1/13, and soon to be updated with 2/12
>> and 2/14 merges), and they are identical (modulo some commit message
>> fixes). I will likely merge from trunk every other day or so to keep
>> it up with trunk until the merge to trunk goes through.
>> Almost there!
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I took a quick look at the megapatch attached to hbase-7290. Added some
>>> minor remarks to the issue.
>>> +1 on commit as long as hadoopqa is green (caveat the flakies).
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jonathan Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>> We did a branch merge of the snapshot branch (hbase-6055 and
>>>> hbase-7290 combined) with trunk on 2/1/13. This merge initially had
>>>> several always broken tests but since then Ted, Matteo and myself
>>>> fixed all the always-broken unit tests. I've merged again today
>>>> 2/12/13 , and posted a patch on HBASE-7290 for the hadoopqa bot to
>>>> There are primarily four of us who worked on this branch -- Jesse Y,
>>>> Matteo, Ted Yu and myself, so if we each +1, technically we would have
>>>> the 3 +1's required and could merge. I wanted to solicit +1's from
>>>> the four who worked on it (all committers now) and also find out if
>>>> anyone else has started reviewing the code or intends to in the next
>>>> few days. It is a large patch (1.3MB) that I can post on review
>>>> board, but it may be easier to understand by going to the different
>>>> individual jiras (some of which have design docs). Generally we've
>>>> been using a looser of review then commit for each of the subtasks. If
>>>> I get clean test runs from the QA bot and +1's from the folks who
>>>> worked on it or planned on reviewing it, I'd like merge sooner rather
>>>> than later.
>>>> On the unit testing front, I've personally gotten one error-free unit
>>>> tests runs runs and one with a failure in hbase-examples:
>>>> On the system testing side, I've been testing the pre-merge version
>>>> outlined by Aleks  and it had been fairly robust on a 5 node
>>>> cluster with fault injection. I've also done some testing on a 20
>>>> node cluster (no fault injection) and a few runs on a 100 node cluster
>>>> where the snapshoting feature has been robust.
>>>>  https://github.com/jmhsieh/hbase/tree/snapshot-merge-0212
>>>>  http://markmail.org/message/pdbkq654ipuxyt6a
>>>> // Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
>>>> // Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>> // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars Hofhansl 2013-02-13, 04:00