Jordan Zimmerman 2014-01-08, 17:30
Camille Fournier 2014-01-08, 19:43
Jordan Zimmerman 2014-01-08, 19:46
Ted Dunning 2014-01-08, 23:40
Patrick Hunt 2014-01-09, 00:04
Actually, web sockets might be more interesting than REST. Hmm….
From: Ted Dunning Ted Dunning
Reply: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: January 8, 2014 at 6:40:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: contrib REST?
If you are going to try to put a web-ish interface on ZK, look at web
sockets so that you can get notifications.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My focus is langs that have mediocre or no ZK support (i.e. Ruby). I’m
> thinking of adding a REST package to Curator that exposes recipes as REST
> calls. e.g all of Curator’s recipes (where possible) would be exposed as
> REST calls. While I’m doing this, I could also expose the low level ZK APIs.
> From: Camille Fournier Camille Fournier
> Reply: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: January 8, 2014 at 2:43:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: contrib REST?
> I've never been super crazy about a REST interface for ZK, since so much of
> the correctness etc depends on handling state changes. But I realize this
> concern might be pedantic.
> Glancing at the java code, it could use at minimum a bit of a facelift...
> lots of System.out.printlns in there.
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What’s the status of the REST interface in contrib (
> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/trunk/src/contrib/rest)? Is it
> > up to date/maintained? I think a REST interface to ZooKeeper would be
> > useful.
> > -Jordan