On 3/7/13 5:16 PM, "Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(I'm sending this for Doug Meil; he is having difficulty getting this up
>the dev list)
>Notes from an HBase client conference call a few of us had yesterday.
> Attendees: Enis, Nick D., James Taylor, Stack, LarsH, Doug Meil and Andy
> - Discussion of Serialization Scheme Independent of Java
> - After a short discussion, this is a very interesting idea but off
> the table for the next 4-6 releases.
> - E.g., would we have to invent serialization for C++ or Python
> clients? It's not a small undertaking.
> - Nobody was aware of any other open source libraries that did this.
> - Component Priority
> - After a healthy discussion, the following priority emerged:
> - 1) Serialized Types
> - But focusing on Java. Using some combination of Orderly and
> - Nick/James to lead this.
> - New Jira will be created for this effort, with sub-tasks for
> follow-on tasks.
> - 2) Utilities
> - E.g., something akin to what HBASE-7221 was trying to achieve.
> This might also be a documentation exercise on how to
>properly use Orderly
> - I.e., utilities to build rowkeys (et al.) in code for use by
> applications (I.e., not Hbase itself)
> - Consensus on support for both FixedLength and VariableLength
> rowkeys, to allow for faster scans especially in the former
> still providing utilities for variable length keys because
>folks still use
> things like URLs in rowkeys.
> - 3) Schema
> - Schema definitions of rowkeys and tables that could be
> externalized to Hive, et al.
> - HBase-Centric API
> - With respect to Utilities and Schemas, there was consensus that
> completely enveloping HTable is not the suggested path, but rather
> should look for opportunities to improve the Get, Put, Scan
> Htable but make it less tedious with byte-array handling.
> - HBASE-7221
> - This will be closed as "won't fixed", but will be linked from
> whatever the new Jira is as a related ticket.
> - Agreeing To Something And Actually Doing It
> - Stack proposed the novel idea of all of us agreeing to something
> and then actually doing it, and there was consensus that this was a
> idea. :-)