-Re: Discussion for (potentially) excessive Shell setiter options
David Medinets 2013-01-31, 01:50
+1 for more shell command to simplify.
On Jan 30, 2013 6:08 PM, "Christopher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to add a warning to aggregators and filters, for the setiter
> shell command (for ACCUMULO-953), but it looks like a warning was already
> added for aggregators, and filters are no longer available anyway.
> But, after looking at it, I see that it has a crazy amount of options, and
> I can't imagine that is very useful to users.
> I think we need to re-think the practice of providing a separate option for
> separate iterators.
> The following I think are unnecessary:
> -ageoff (--ageoff)
> -agg (--aggregator) // already has a deprecation warning
> -regex (--regular-expression)
> -reqvis (--require-visibility)
> -vers (--version)
> because, we already have:
> -class (--class-name)
> I also think that if a particular iterator is really so useful that it
> requires a special option, it should probably be in a separate command that
> extends the setiter command, and reduces the number of options, instead of
> growing the number of options (though, this has a downside, too, in that
> there may grow an excess of commands).
> We have an opportunity to deprecate some of these options now (with a
> warning if used), before we release 1.5.0. Thoughts?
> Christopher L Tubbs II