Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # dev >> HEADSUP: Working on new 0.96.0RC


+
Stack 2013-10-04, 21:20
+
Stack 2013-10-06, 00:00
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-06, 01:01
+
Stack 2013-10-06, 01:30
+
Steve Loughran 2013-10-07, 08:33
+
Steve Loughran 2013-10-07, 08:58
+
Stack 2013-10-07, 17:00
+
Steve Loughran 2013-10-07, 17:05
+
Stack 2013-10-07, 20:46
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-08, 21:43
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-09, 17:45
+
Sergey Shelukhin 2013-10-09, 17:56
+
Stack 2013-10-09, 18:54
+
Sergey Shelukhin 2013-10-09, 19:42
+
Stack 2013-10-09, 19:45
+
Jimmy Xiang 2013-10-09, 19:45
+
Devaraj Das 2013-10-09, 20:38
+
Elliott Clark 2013-10-09, 21:17
+
Devaraj Das 2013-10-09, 21:33
+
Elliott Clark 2013-10-09, 21:52
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-09, 23:51
+
Stack 2013-10-10, 00:13
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-10, 00:30
+
Stack 2013-10-10, 00:55
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-10, 02:14
+
Stack 2013-10-10, 03:08
+
Elliott Clark 2013-10-10, 04:22
+
Sergey Shelukhin 2013-10-10, 17:08
Copy link to this message
-
Re: HEADSUP: Working on new 0.96.0RC
Can we agree if the IT tests are green for a certain number of runs in a
row, then it's stable?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Sergey Shelukhin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> It looks like HBASE-9724 got committed. Was it the final patch for it? It's
> a small and hopefully safe.
>
> If patch is large and risky, and the feature it fixes is semi-experimental,
> like HBASE-9696, IMHO it should not be blocker for the release.
> The concern is that we keep making large changes to AM that fix some bugs
> but may introduce more bugs (like it happened with the last one), so it's
> hard to tell when it will stabilize at all.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To me it feels like HBASE-9724 should go into 0.96.  We're not releasing
> a
> > new rc tonight, it seems really weird to hold up a bug fix to try and hit
> > some unknown, and un-agreed upon, deadline.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> > Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figure
> > out
> > >> something.
> > >> As I see it, HBASE-9563 is committed,
> > >
> > >
> > > It is still open and committed with qualification "Stack:...Was going
> to
> > > try this first but likely needs more..."  and "Elliott: +1 I think it's
> > > an improvement even if it doesn't 100% fix the master issue."
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> and HBASE-9696 is not a blocker
> > >> against 0.96. But if you argue that 9696 is indeed a blocker, let's
> > raise
> > >> it as such.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Agree.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> There is no point in creating an RC, an immediately sinking it
> > >> if we cannot verify the RC for a +1. We don't run into data loss
> issues
> > >> anymore which is why I still think we can release 0.96 even without
> 9696
> > >> and 9724. Nothing is preventing us to release 0.96.1, with this and
> more
> > >> fixes in let's say a couple of weeks or months.
> > >>
> > >> I guess let's wait for tomorrow to see whether there is any progress
> on
> > >> 9563 and 9696.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes.  Lets take this up tomorrow.  Elliott and I are on the master
> issue,
> > > HBASE-9563, this evening.
> > >
> > > Thanks Enis,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
+
Sergey Shelukhin 2013-10-11, 01:39
+
Stack 2013-10-11, 17:05
+
Stack 2013-10-11, 21:03
+
Ted Yu 2013-10-11, 21:07
+
Devaraj Das 2013-10-11, 21:09
+
Stack 2013-10-11, 21:19
+
Stack 2013-10-11, 21:56
+
liushaohui 2013-10-12, 02:12
+
Stack 2013-10-12, 03:42
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-10, 18:18
+
Jimmy Xiang 2013-10-09, 21:49
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-10-09, 23:05
+
Jimmy Xiang 2013-10-09, 23:29