In 2.0 we've reimplemented the shuffle using Netty for a significant speed up. Moving webhdfs to Netty would be interesting.
On Jul 11, 2012, at 6:03, Robert Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am +1 on this also, although I think we need to look at moving to
> Jetty-7 or possibly dropping Jetty completely and look at Netty or even
> Tomcat long term. Jetty has just been way too unstable at Hadoop scale
> and that has not really changed with newer versions of Jetty. Sticking
> with an old forked unsupported version of Jetty longterm seems very risky
> too me.
> On 7/10/12 5:19 PM, "Todd Lipcon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 from me too. We've had this in CDH since Sep '11 and been working
>> much better than the stock 6.1.26.
>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Owen O'Malley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Graves
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>> I'm +1 for adding it.
>>> I'm +1 also.
>>> -- Owen
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera