Roshan Punnoose 2013-01-18, 20:58
Eric Newton 2013-01-19, 23:28
Can you run a performance test between the two options? What amount of
data is being stored? What is the size of the rows? There are so many
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Roshan Punnoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it more performant to have multiple tables for different sets of data, or would having a properly split table into tablets have the same or better performance.
> I am storing data in three tables, but I was wondering if putting all that data into one table, with a row prefix, would have better performance. Thanks!
> Roshan Punnoose
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]