Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - [DISCUSSION] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues


+
Stack 2013-06-25, 03:45
+
Devaraj Das 2013-07-01, 20:40
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-01, 20:54
+
Devaraj Das 2013-07-01, 21:54
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-01, 22:42
+
Stack 2013-07-01, 22:34
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-01, 22:56
+
Devaraj Das 2013-07-02, 00:32
+
Devaraj Das 2013-07-01, 22:45
+
Stack 2013-07-01, 22:31
+
Stack 2013-07-09, 20:14
+
Stack 2013-07-17, 19:12
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-17, 20:45
+
Stack 2013-07-17, 21:58
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-07-17, 22:21
+
Stack 2013-07-17, 23:43
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-07-17, 23:21
+
Stack 2013-07-17, 23:41
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [DISCUSSION] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
Enis Söztutar 2013-07-18, 00:24
> These are both criticals.  Maybe they should be blocker altogether since
> can't ship w/o them.
>

Ok, did that.
 >

>  > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6929 (same for 0.94 and
> 0.96)
> >
> >
> This is a 0.94 issue.  Could fall out from hbase-8224 work.
>

Agreed, as long as HBASE-8224 will enable us to publish 0.96-hadoop2 to
mvn, and at the time of release we do that, we are golden. 0.94-hadoop2 is
not a blocker.

>
>
>
> > For migration, there are some steps that the a user has to perform before
> > going to 0.96 (recompile with 0.96, select hadoop1 or hadoop2, some minor
> > class renamings, etc), we should document these steps in the book. (I
> don't
> > remember we already have an open jira for this.)
> >
> >
> HBASE-8348 Polish the migration to 0.96
>
>
> > For testing, IT tests are rapidly improving. We will also start running
> > those (or a subset of those) against 0.96.
> >
>
>
> Sweet.
>
> St.Ack
>
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-18, 22:54
+
Stack 2013-07-19, 03:56