Agree with Bobby, baby steps
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Robert Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that having it be pluggable opens up a lot of new possibilities.
> +1 for the idea. Although I think in the short term we are having enough
> problems as it is with just CPU and memory that it may be a little while
> before we get to a pluggable solution. Once YARN-2 goes in, if you can
> get an initial proof of concept patch for a generic solution I would be
> happy to review it and push for it to go in.
> On 10/22/12 5:41 AM, "Radim Kolar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I have proposal for improved resource scheduling.
>>as i see, development seems to go other way for example in
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-2 for every added kind of
>>resource there has to be significant rework.
>>you do not see benefits of having framework able to handle custom
>>resource types? Its not all about memory and cores. You need to schedule
>>jobs based on other factors (network capacity, availability of GPU
>>cores, data locality).
>>And every cluster might have special considerations for example do not
>>overload central SQL database. We usually have few hundred submitted
>>jobs, proper resource sharing is essential. No point in running jobs
>>which needs GPU which is in use by other mapper, better to run some
>>other jobs until gpu becomes available again.