Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> VOTE: hbase-0.95RC1, the second "Development" Series Release is available [WAS -> VOTE: hbase-0.95.0RC0, the first "Developer Release" release candidate is available for download and vote]


Copy link to this message
-
Re: VOTE: hbase-0.95RC1, the second "Development" Series Release is available [WAS -> VOTE: hbase-0.95.0RC0, the first "Developer Release" release candidate is available for download and vote]
DEBUG is lower than INFO. Edit log4j.properties to set the loglevel for
org.apache.hadoop.hbase to INFO.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Tests in progress...
>
> Lru is pretty verbose...
>
> jmspaggi@hbasetest:~/hbase/hbase-0.95.0-hadoop1$ cat
> logs/hbase-jmspaggi-master-hbasetest.log | wc
>   53518  938381 9515387
> jmspaggi@hbasetest:~/hbase/hbase-0.95.0-hadoop1$ cat
> logs/hbase-jmspaggi-master-hbasetest.log | grep LruBlockCache | wc
>   50163  902918 8760832
>
> Should we reduce the log level to INFO for it?
>
> 2013-04-03 10:29:43,905 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache: Block cache LRU
> eviction started; Attempting to free 9.72 MB of total=239.32 MB
> 2013-04-03 10:29:43,906 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache: Block cache LRU
> eviction completed; freed=9.77 MB, total=229.74 MB, single=236.92 MB,
> multi=555.2 KB, memory=0 KB
> 2013-04-03 10:29:43,941 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache: Block cache LRU
> eviction started; Attempting to free 9.72 MB of total=239.32 MB
> 2013-04-03 10:29:43,942 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache: Block cache LRU
> eviction completed; freed=9.77 MB, total=229.74 MB, single=236.86 MB,
> multi=555.2 KB, memory=0 KB
> 2013-04-03 10:29:43,978 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache: Block cache LRU
> eviction started; Attempting to free 9.72 MB of total=239.32 MB
> 2013-04-03 10:29:43,978 DEBUG
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache: Block cache LRU
> eviction completed; freed=9.77 MB, total=229.74 MB, single=236.92 MB,
> multi=555.2 KB, memory=0 KB
>
> JM
>
> 2013/4/3 Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +1
> >
> > Verified the gpg signature for hadoop2 and source tar balls.
> > Spun up a local instance.
> > Created tables. Put data, got data
> > Ran TestAcidGuarantees for about 2 hours.
> > Tried an online schema change while running test acid. (seemed to work
> but
> > caused a huge drop in throughput)
> > Created a snapshot while test acid was going on.
> > Ran apache-rat on the source
> >
> > Native libs aren't present (are they supposed to be there for mlock ?)
> > I filed some minor jiras but everything seems good for a developer
> release.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Here is the second 0.95.0 release candidate.  Should we put this out as
> >> 0.95.0?  Please
> >> vote by friday, April 5th.
> >>
> >> See the refguide [1] for definition of what a "Development" Series
> Release
> >> is (or read below where we call it a 'developer release").  In short,
> it is
> >> a preview release, not for production, put out early so us devs start
> >> getting feedback the sooner.
> >>
> >> The release is available here:
> >>
> >>   http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.95.0RC1/
> >>
> >> Issues fixed in this release are available here:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12324094
> >>
> >> ...including a fix for HBASE-8242, the issue that sunk the first release
> >> candidate.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Here is our first 0.95.0 release candidate.  Should we put this out as
> >> > 0.95.0?
> >> >
> >> > The 0.95.x series of releases are designated "developer releases", a
> type
> >> > of release we have done in the past -- see the 0.89.x series -- where
> we
> >> > let out 'raw', barely-tested product so developers and those generally
> >> > interested can get some early exposure to what our next stable
> release to
> >> > follow 0.94.x will look like.  Putting out these 'rough cuts' also
> helps
> >> > to get the feedback started earlier while the release is still baking.
> >> >
> >> > These "developer release" come with no guarantees.  We make no
> >> > promises that the next release will be compatible with this one or

Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)