-Re: [jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4539) Streaming Edits to a Backup Node.
Could you please post questions to
Jiras are for tracking issues. This one is closed.
The answer to your question if I understood it correctly is that
there is no mechanism for fail over to BackupNode so far.
You can find more details about different types of nodes in hdfs
and recent paper:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Hari A V (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hari A V commented on HADOOP-4539:
> I am pretty new to Hadoop and HDFS. I was curious what happens to an
> incomplete file write.
> 1. Namenode Active and Standby running
> 2. From a client, i started copying 1 GB file
> 3. Around 500 MB is copied, while Primary Namenode goes down.
> Some how, if i make the standby name node to active and make the client to
> resumbit the request to the new Active name node, whether file copying will
> continue from where it is left or it will restart ?
> I am seeing some issues with acquiring of Lease in case of client
> requesting to the new Active name node. Can anyone please help me with this
> > Streaming Edits to a Backup Node.
> > ---------------------------------
> > Key: HADOOP-4539
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4539
> > Project: Hadoop Common
> > Issue Type: New Feature
> > Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> > Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
> > Fix For: 0.21.0
> > Attachments: BackupNode.patch, BackupNode.patch,
> BackupNode.patch, BackupNode.patch, BackupNode.patch, BackupNode.patch,
> image001.gif, StreamEditsToBN.pdf, StreamEditsToSNN.htm
> > Currently Secondary name-node acts as mere checkpointer.
> > Secondary name-node should be transformed into a standby name-node (SNN).
> > The long term goal is to make it a warm standby.
> > The purpose of this issue is to provide real time streaming of edits to
> SNN so that it contained the up-to-date namespace state.
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.