Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> Is anyone using serialized iterators to provide provenance data?

Copy link to this message
Re: Is anyone using serialized iterators to provide provenance data?
Oh, I see what you mean. Table B was created from table A with a
function F (where F is some collection of iterators like you said).

It could be a neat application of the clone command. Storing that
information on table B is some exercise in where to put that immutable
information (that's me ignoring that problem :P).

You say git: do you actually intend to have a cheap replay ability? Or
merely be able to view the history and be able to work through the
transformations again?

Seems reasonable for a 1.6 wish to me.

On 05/15/2013 08:44 PM, David Medinets wrote:
> I don't see those as covering the same ground. Let's say I have an
> Accumulo table for a given human's genome. As a scientist, I want to
> apply a set of filters to create a subset of the genome. This provides
> a transform from data-set A to data-set B. Since iterators were used
> for the transform, we could serialize the set of iterators used by the
> transformation. Both data-sets are immutable. Think git for data-sets.
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     I think this might relate to ACCUMULO-1397, in the form of providing a
>     mechanism to specify iterator profiles, or ACCUMULO-415.
>     --
>     Christopher L Tubbs II
>     http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>     On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:51 PM, David Medinets
>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     > If you apply a set of iterators to one table to produce another,
>     it seems
>     > possible to serialize the iterator stack alongside the new table
>     in some
>     > catalog to provide provenance. The assumption is that the tables are
>     > immutable, I think. Is anyone doing this or has anyone thought
>     about doing
>     > so? Just curious and wanted to ask before I forgot about the idea.