Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> DISCUSS: Have hbase require at least hadoop 1.0.0 in hbase 0.96.0?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: DISCUSS: Have hbase require at least hadoop 1.0.0 in hbase 0.96.0?
+1 as well.
Will definitely be nice to take some load off Jenkins too :)
-------------------
Jesse Yates
240-888-2200
@jesse_yates
jyates.github.com
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:29 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: HBase Dev List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 11:24 AM
> Subject: DISCUSS: Have hbase require at least hadoop 1.0.0 in hbase 0.96.0?
>
> Should we make it so hbase 0.96.0 requires at least hadoop 1.0.0?
> This would mean we would no longer support running on older versions
> such as branch-0.20-append (and perhaps stuff like CDH2?)?
>
> Requiring Hadoop 1.0.0 at least means we can presume security and
> append.  We also narrow the set of hadoops we need to support
> simplifying things for ourselves some.
>
> What you lot think?
> St.Ack
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB