-Re: Okay to purge trace table?
Mike Drob 2013-06-07, 01:06
I already created a ticket for it -
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:00 PM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Does it make sense to create a JIRA ticket asking for an age-off iterator
> to be the default on the trace table? Maybe set for something like two
> weeks? If we don't add a default age-off iterator, where should the
> documentation be changed to talk about this topic? Does the user manual
> talk about the trace table?
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You could put an age-off iterator on it, or just purge it from
>> I probably should have configured the trace table with an age-off filter
>> by default. But for now, you need to manually manage the data.
>> You can use delete rows to wipe the table efficiently:
>> shell > deleterows -f -t trace
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Terry P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Greetings all,
>>> We have a million entries in the trace table in one of our Accumulo
>>> clusters and a million and a half in another. We haven't manually enabled
>>> any tracing activities, and in looking at the entries, they seem to be
>>> generated by Accumulo does on its own (compact, wal, getFileStatus,
>>> minorCompactionStarted, minorCompaction, prep, commit, etc).
>>> Does Accumulo maintain this table or do I / should I manually purge it
>>> from time to time? If it's on us to maintain it, are there any guidelines
>>> or a procedure for doing so?
>>> Thanks in advance,