Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo, mail # user - Okay to purge trace table?

Copy link to this message
Re: Okay to purge trace table?
Mike Drob 2013-06-07, 01:06

I already created a ticket for it -

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:00 PM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Does it make sense to create a JIRA ticket asking for an age-off iterator
> to be the default on the trace table? Maybe set for something like two
> weeks? If we don't add a default age-off iterator, where should the
> documentation be changed to talk about this topic? Does the user manual
> talk about the trace table?
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You could put an age-off iterator on it, or just purge it from
>> time-to-time.
>> I probably should have configured the trace table with an age-off filter
>> by default.  But for now, you need to manually manage the data.
>> You can use delete rows to wipe the table efficiently:
>>  shell > deleterows -f -t trace
>> -Eric
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Terry P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Greetings all,
>>> We have a million entries in the trace table in one of our Accumulo
>>> clusters and a million and a half in another.  We haven't manually enabled
>>> any tracing activities, and in looking at the entries, they seem to be
>>> generated by Accumulo does on its own (compact, wal, getFileStatus,
>>> minorCompactionStarted, minorCompaction, prep, commit, etc).
>>> Does Accumulo maintain this table or do I / should I manually purge it
>>> from time to time?  If it's on us to maintain it, are there any guidelines
>>> or a procedure for doing so?
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Terry