Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Avro >> mail # user >> GenericRecord and passivity


+
kulkarni.swarnim@...) 2013-10-15, 22:43
Copy link to this message
-
Re: GenericRecord and passivity
GenericRecord should work well in this context.  Can you provide a
complete example that fails?

Doug

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we know if a GenericRecord is robust to schema evolution? I am currently
> seeing cases where I get an exception like the following if I try to
> deserialize an older record with a newer schema.
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 8
>
> at org.apache.avro.io.parsing.Symbol$Alternative.getSymbol(Symbol.java:364)
>
> at org.apache.avro.io.ResolvingDecoder.doAction(ResolvingDecoder.java:229)
>
> at org.apache.avro.io.parsing.Parser.advance(Parser.java:88)
>
> at org.apache.avro.io.ResolvingDecoder.readIndex(ResolvingDecoder.java:206)
>
> at
> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.read(GenericDatumReader.java:152)
>
> at
> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.readRecord(GenericDatumReader.java:177)
>
> at
> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.read(GenericDatumReader.java:148)
>
> at
> org.apache.avro.generic.GenericDatumReader.read(GenericDatumReader.java:139)
>
>
> The newer schema just has a few more fields added to it and no names from
> the older schema were changed.
>
> Is this a known issue? Should a SpecificRecord be always considered when
> passivity is important?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Swarnim
+
kulkarni.swarnim@...) 2013-10-15, 23:01
+
Eric Wasserman 2013-10-15, 23:49
+
Doug Cutting 2013-10-15, 23:53