Connor Doyle 2013-03-18, 04:16
Doug Cutting 2013-03-19, 16:05
Yep, that is helpful.
For reference, the project (in its early stages) is here: https://github.com/GenslerAppsPod/scalavro
On 19 Mar 2013, at 11:05, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The RPC handshake was designed to be tolerant of differences in the
> protocol hashing method. The java implementation uses MD5 of the
> protocol's un-normalized text. This could result in the needless
> transmission over the wire of protocols that only differ in trivial
> ways, but since clients and servers cache these, they should't be
> transmitted often.
> A server should cache a client's protocol using the client-computed
> hash as key. So if two clients hash schemas differently then the
> server will end up with two entries in its cache. This permits
> variation in implementation (intentional or not).
> Does that help?
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Connor Doyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've started working on a reflective Avro library for the Scala programming
>> The description of Parsing Canonical Form is clear enough for schemas, but I
>> can't seem to find any mention of prescribed ordering of the "types" field
>> for protocol definitions in the current specification. I've based my first
>> pass on forward declarations elimination, but this gives only a partial
>> In the absence of spec I can base behavior on the reference (Java)
>> implementation, but am curious about this aspect of the handshake.