Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond

Copy link to this message
Re: [DISCUSSION] Thinking about 20.204 and beyond
Yup.  Frequent releases, some focused on getting to stable on older code lines, some pushing new code out for people to try.

On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:39 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>> On 18/06/2011 21:22, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> olutely no reason that trunk cannot be packaged for release
>>> tomorrow as 0.23.  There may be many reasons why it won't pass a release
>>> vote, but we probably aren't going to find them until somebody tries.
>> One limitation with releases has always been size of cluster testing -where Yahoo!s contributions have been invaluable. That said, we shouldn't make them an SPOF in the release process; we should all set up to do some more release testing.
> Yes, more testing is better, but if it can't be tested by the dev team
> in 72 hours then it doesn't belong in our release process.
> Please note that one of the main advantages of open source development
> is that the bulk of testing/QA occurs *after* the release.  That's why
> labels like alpha/beta/GA are best applied/updated after the version number
> has been cut and the software has been proven in real deployments.
> If testing on 5000 nodes is important to our customers, then add a
> scale-tested metric to the download site so that the customers know
> which release package has been tested at what scale -- they will
> understand the difference between frequent releases and those fully tested
> at scale.  Let them decide which version is best to use for their own needs.
> ....Roy