Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> JIRA Patch Conventions


+
Mike Drob 2013-04-24, 03:51
Copy link to this message
-
Re: JIRA Patch Conventions
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Mike Drob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Accumulo Devs,
>
> Are there any conventions that we'd like to follow for attaching updated
> patches to issues? There are two lines of thought applicable here:
>
> 1) Remove the old one and attach the new patch. This has the advantage of
> being immediately obvious to future google searchers what the patch was,
> especially in case of back porting issues.
> 2) Leave all patches attached to the ticket, and use a one-up identifier
> for each subsequent patch. This preserves context from comments, and might
> be useful in other ways.
> I've seen both approaches used on Accumulo tickets, and don't have a strong
> preference outside of a desire for consistency. I think I'd lean towards
> option #2, if only because that means I get one fewer email notification.
>

I agree I would like consistency.   I lean towards 2 also, but I do not
have a good reason, its just my preference.  We should probably put
together a page outlining how to submit a patch.  I have seen other
projects do this.
>
> As an aside, what is the IP status of submitted patches? I think I remember
> hearing that they immediately become part of the Apache Foundation, so
> removing them might be a bad idea from that perspective.
>

Does someone who is submitting patches need to submit an ICLA?
>
> Mike
>
+
Josh Elser 2013-04-24, 14:04
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-24, 15:07
+
John Vines 2013-04-24, 15:08
+
Corey Nolet 2013-04-24, 15:22
+
William Slacum 2013-04-24, 17:45
+
Christopher 2013-04-24, 18:04
+
Brian Loss 2013-04-24, 19:28