-DISCUSSION: 0.96.0: Purge CoprocessorProtocol and all associated parts of this jettisoned engine?
Stack 2012-12-20, 21:20
Are folks down with purging CoprocessorProtocol in 0.96 and all of its
For example, Andrew Purtell says "I'd be +1 with dropping
CoprocessorProtocol from 0.96 and up, given all of the other (deliberate)
incompatibilities posed with RPC going from 0.94 to 0.96 and up." .
CoprocessorProtocol is how we did dynamic endpoints before 0.96/trunk where
we are moving to protobuf'ing all rpc Interactions. Dynamic endpoints are
now done using CoprocessorService where you define your endpoint as a
protobuf Service .
+ Any current coprocessor dynamic endpoint will need to be refactored to
run on 0.96
+ We will have to support two very different underpinnings for an exotic
though critical feature (We'd have to do this if we wanted to deprecate to
purge in another release)
+ Purge a bunch of code. Simplify RPC. Save a bunch of effort making sure
both mechanisms work. One, "cleaner" (though perhaps more verbose) way of
implementing dynamic endpoints.
I'm in favor of purge without deprecation. I've done a few convertions. I
volunteer to help out anyone who needs to make the transition.
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-20, 22:10
Stack 2012-12-20, 23:40
Andrew Purtell 2012-12-21, 00:04