|
|
-
Re: Plans for asynchbase re:96
Nick Dimiduk 2012-12-05, 23:19
What's the status on this thread? Did you guys ever sit together?
-n
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:11 PM, tsuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > I want to have asynchbase speak PB to 0.96, while maintaining > > compatibility with previous versions of HBase. I haven't closely > > followed the state of things in 0.96, but if things are deemed stable > > in 0.96 (as in: no more significant change to the protocol) it's > > worthwhile to start looking at integrating support for the new > > protocol in asynchbase. > > > > I'd say wait till we branch Benoit... then lets sit together so can > save you some headache figuring whats going on. > > Go easy, > St.Ack >
+
Nick Dimiduk 2012-12-05, 23:19
-
Re: Plans for asynchbase re:96
Stack 2012-12-05, 23:38
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the status on this thread? Did you guys ever sit together? > > Not that I know of. We need to finish our pb'ing before we go visit the tsuna (looks like -ROOT- will be gone before 0.96 ships too.. .and that should be basically in place before we tackle asynchbasing connection).
St.Ack
+
Stack 2012-12-05, 23:38
|
|
All projects made searchable here are trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation.
Service operated by
Sematext