-Re: PROPOSAL: how to handle release documentation going forward
Gianmarco De Francisci Mo... 2012-10-23, 17:20
I guess this is the only way to ensure documented code.
We need to put this rule somewhere, maybe in the Wiki?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Santhosh M S
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jonathan Coveney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 5:09 PM
> Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: how to handle release documentation going forward
> As someone who chronically under-documents, I think that this is a good
> idea. +1
> 2012/10/22 Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Since we lost the dedicated document writer for Pig, would it make sense
>> to require that going forward (0.12 and beyond) we require that
>> documentation updates are included in the patch together with code changes
>> and tests. I think that should work for most features/updates except
>> perhaps big items that might require more than one JIRA to be completed
>> before documentation changes make sense.