Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
MapReduce >> mail # dev >> branch development for HADOOP-9639


+
Sangjin Lee 2013-12-02, 19:47
+
Chris Nauroth 2013-12-06, 17:49
Copy link to this message
-
Re: branch development for HADOOP-9639
Chris,

I'm already on it.

Thanks.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Chris Nauroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1 for the idea.  The branch committership clause was added for exactly
> this kind of scenario.
>
> From the phrasing in the bylaws, it looks like we'll need assistance from
> PMC to get the ball rolling.  Is there a PMC member out there who could
> volunteer to help start the process with Sangjin?
>
> Chris Nauroth
> Hortonworks
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Sangjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We have been having discussions on HADOOP-9639 (shared cache for jars)
> and
> > the proposed design there for some time now. We are going to start work
> on
> > this and have it vetted and reviewed by the community. I have just filed
> > some more implementation JIRAs for this feature: YARN-1465,
> MAPREDUCE-5662,
> > YARN-1466, YARN-1467
> >
> > Rather than working privately in our corner and sharing a big patch at
> the
> > end, I'd like to explore the idea of developing on a branch in the public
> > to foster more public feedback. Recently the Hadoop PMC has passed the
> > change to the bylaws to allow for branch committers (
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-general/201307.mbox/%3CCACO5Y4y7HZnn3BS-ZyCVfv-UBcMudeQhndr2vqg%3DXqE1oBiQvQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > ),
> > and I think it would be a good model for this development.
> >
> > I'd like to propose a branch development and a branch committer status
> for
> > a couple of us who are going to work on this per bylaw. Could you please
> > let me know what you think?
> >
> >  Thanks,
> > Sangjin
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

--
Alejandro
+
Eli Collins 2013-12-06, 19:56
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB