-Re: branch development for HADOOP-9639
Alejandro Abdelnur 2013-12-06, 19:52
I'm already on it.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Chris Nauroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> +1 for the idea. The branch committership clause was added for exactly
> this kind of scenario.
> From the phrasing in the bylaws, it looks like we'll need assistance from
> PMC to get the ball rolling. Is there a PMC member out there who could
> volunteer to help start the process with Sangjin?
> Chris Nauroth
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Sangjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We have been having discussions on HADOOP-9639 (shared cache for jars)
> > the proposed design there for some time now. We are going to start work
> > this and have it vetted and reviewed by the community. I have just filed
> > some more implementation JIRAs for this feature: YARN-1465,
> > YARN-1466, YARN-1467
> > Rather than working privately in our corner and sharing a big patch at
> > end, I'd like to explore the idea of developing on a branch in the public
> > to foster more public feedback. Recently the Hadoop PMC has passed the
> > change to the bylaws to allow for branch committers (
> > ),
> > and I think it would be a good model for this development.
> > I'd like to propose a branch development and a branch committer status
> > a couple of us who are going to work on this per bylaw. Could you please
> > let me know what you think?
> > Thanks,
> > Sangjin
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.