Srihari Srinivasan 2013-07-12, 14:07
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-12, 15:52
Srihari Srinivasan 2013-07-26, 16:50
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-26, 17:37
If I understand correctly what you are suggesting is we add the snippet
below in the http-engine's pom file. Since I already have java-exec depend
on http-engine won't this make it a case of having cyclic dependencies that
mvn will complain about?
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's get an alpha out before we break out the client.
> In the meantime, I downloaded your stuff and it seemed to work fine
> when it depends on java-exec.
> I'd suggest you use the dependency like this to avoid any weird conflicts:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Srihari Srinivasan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > Any thoughts on the DrillClient modularization/short term alternative?
> > Hari
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Srihari Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: Meeting today
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Hi,
> > Quick note on what we discussed w.r.t the REST API.
> > I am at a point where to submit a query (logical for now) to the
> Drillbit I
> > need an instance of the DrillClient class from the Query REST resource.
> > DrillClient is currently part of the java-exec module. I've pulled out
> > jersey/jetty stuff into its own mvn module to keep the concerns separate.
> > So the really question is - Is now a good time to pull out DrillClient
> > its dependencies into its own client module? That way http-engine can
> > depend on the client lib. Having this will be a huge help as it can
> > potentially keep a parallel stream of working going.
> > Any other ideas/suggestions?
> > Jason - This is the link to my github
> > branch<https://github.com/srihari/incubator-drill>.
> > Its still a clone of the execwork branch.
> > -- Hari
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sounds good to me.
> >> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Srihari Srinivasan
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > HI Folks,
> >> >
> >> > Moving on I am trying to implement the functionality that creates a
> >> > via the REST interface. I have a question w.r.t its implementation.
> >> way
> >> > to implement this would be via the DrillClient class by calling its
> >> > runQuery(QueryType) method as illustrated in
> >> >
> >> > Does this approach make sense? Should we be considering any other
> >> > alternatives?
> >> >
> >> > Hari
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-27, 13:12
Srihari Srinivasan 2013-07-27, 13:31
Jacques Nadeau 2013-07-27, 13:39
Srihari Srinivasan 2013-07-28, 17:25
Srihari Srinivasan 2013-07-30, 11:56
Srihari Srinivasan 2013-08-01, 13:02
Jacques Nadeau 2013-08-01, 18:51