Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> MiniCluster and "provided" scope dependencies

Copy link to this message
Re: MiniCluster and "provided" scope dependencies

I remember kind of having this discussion in June because I wanted to be
able to run the minicluster as a single node accumulo using the start

I like this approach better. 1.6.0 provides a main method for firing up the
minicluster and having the dependencies in the pom will allow developers to
fire it up without needing Hadoop/Zookeeper installed.

ACCUMULO-1405 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1405>

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Josh Elser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Josh Elser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm curious to hear what people think on this.
> >>
> >> I'm a really big fan of spinning up a minicluster instance to do some
> >> "more real" testing of software as I write it.
> >>
> >> With 1.5.0, it's a bit more painful because I have to add a bunch more
> >> dependencies to my project (which previously would only have to depend
> >> on the accumulo-minicluster artifact). The list includes, but is
> >> likely not limited to, commons-io, commons-configuration,
> >> hadoop-client, zookeeper, log4j, slf4j-api, slf4j-log4j12.
> >>
> >> Best as I understand it, the intent of this was that Hadoop will
> >> typically provide these artifacts at runtime, and therefore Accumulo
> >> doesn't need to re-bundle them itself which I'd agree with (not
> >> getting into that whole issue about the Hadoop "ecosystem"). However,
> >> I would think that the minicluster should have non-provided scope
> >> dependencies declared on these, as there is no Hadoop installation --
> >>
> >
> > Would this require declaring dependencies on a particular version of
> hadoop
> > in the minicluster pom?  Or could the minicluster pom have profiles for
> > different hadoop versions?  I do not know enough about maven to know if
> you
> > can use profiles declared in a dependency (e.g. if a user depends on
> > minicluster, can they activate profiles in it?)
> The actual dependency in minicluster is against Apache Hadoop but
> that's besides the point.
> By marking the hadoop-client dependency as provided that means that
> Hadoop's dependencies are *not* included at runtime (because hadoop is
> provided, and, as such, so are its dependencies). In other words, this
> is completely beside the point of what's actually included in a
> distribution of Hadoop when you download and install it.
> Apache Hadoop has dependencies we need to run minicluster. By marking
> the hadoop-client artifact as 'provided', we do not get its
> dependencies and the minicluster fails to run. I think this is easy
> enough to work around by overriding the dependencies we need to run
> the minicluster in the minicluster module (e.g. make the hadoop-client
> not 'provided' in the minicluster module). Thus, as we add more things
> to the minicluster that require other libraries, we control the
> dependency mgmt instead of forcing that onto the user.
> >
> >
> >> there's just the minicluster. As such, this would alleviate users from
> >> having to dig into our dependency management or trial&error to figure
> >> out what "extra" dependencies they have to include in their project to
> >> actually make it work
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> - Josh
> >>