On 10/11/11 12:30 PM, "Todd Lipcon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One request: can we rename to something like 0.89-fb to make it
>clearer that this is basically a mirror of the FB 89 branch and not
>the branch where the official 89 releases came from?
>On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Nicolas Spiegelberg
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've just created a new branch, 0.89. It has the current state of our
>>largest HBase deploy, Facebook Messaging. 0.89 was branched from HBase
>>trunk back in 2010 before the release of HBase 0.90.0 so its pretty old.
>> The current HBase trunk has most of whats in 0.89 (and more) except for
>>some bug fixes and testing/operation tools. Our intention is to have
>>this branch closely mirror the code that we currently run in production,
>>to provide the community visibility on how we iterate on a branch that
>>serves production, and to serve as a transition point to be more
>>transparent with our production development & porting status. We do
>>most active development on this branch, but we've started moving
>>internal development onto 0.92 & are putting more resources into
>> Q. Should I look into using this 0.89 branch?
>> I would discourage it unless you know what you're doing. The average
>>developer will get far highly quality assistance with 0.90 or 0.92
>>issues. 0.89 is a transitory branch who's main purpose is to move
>>towards 0.90+. This is also about enhancing the transparency for
>>members of the community that are still using 0.89 and making minor
>>fixes/improvements to it.
>> Q. Will there be a release candidate of this branch?
>> There are no current plans to make any official release candidate for
>> Q. Why an Apache branch? Why not just tell Facebook to put what they
>>have on GitHub?
>> 1. Aligning the 0.89 & 0.92 efforts under Apache will accelerate
>>contributing 0.89 master features to the new master on trunk, allow the
>>community to port 0.89 features at a pace that they think is important,
>>and give developers an idea of development history on merge conflicts.
>> 2. Facebook would like to get its developers in the habit of actively
>>using the Apache workflow utilities like JIRA & Review Board instead of
>>internal utilities for their day-to-day HBase operations. We wish to
>>promote transparency and want to find some way for Facebook to improve
>>on this goal as well.
>Software Engineer, Cloudera