The full test suite is passing.
I don't think we need not make a new rc just for one license header missing.
Daniel, is it OK for you ?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Dai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My fault for missing license header for
> UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature. Added it to both files, Thanks
> I run unit tests/e2e tests, both passed. +1 for the rc except for the
> license header issue.
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Prashant Kommireddi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Downloaded tarball and performed the following:
>> 1. ant releaseaudit - UDFContextTestLoaderWithSignature (
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1458036) and
>> DOTParser.jjt do not have Apache License header.
>> 2. Verified RELEASE_NOTES.txt for correct version numbers
>> 3. Verified build.xml points to next version (0.11.2) SNAPSHOT
>> 4. Built and tested Piggybank, Built tutorial - looks good.
>> 5. Tested jar by running scripts against 0.20.2 hadoop cluster (would be
>> great to have someone else test the same)
>> 6. ant test-commit - all tests pass
>> Except for #1, RC looks good to me.
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have created a candidate build for Pig 0.11.1. This is a maintenance
>>> of Pig 0.11.
>>> Keys used to sign the release are available at:
>>> Please download, test, and try it out:
>>> Should we release this? Vote closes on next Thursday EOD, Mar 28th.