Thanks for the response Krishna.
I was wondering if it were possible for using MR to solve you problem
instead of building the whole stack on top of yarn.
Most likely its not possible , thats why you are building it . I wanted to
know why is that ?
I am in just trying to find out the need or why we might need to write the
application on yarn.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Krishna Kishore Bonagiri <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> I am porting a distributed application that runs on a fixed set of given
> resources to YARN, with the aim of being able to run it on a dynamically
> selected resources whichever are available at the time of running the
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Rahul Bhattacharjee <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I was going through the motivation behind Yarn. Splitting the
>> responsibility of JT is the major concern.Ultimately the base (Yarn) was
>> built in a generic way for building other generic distributed applications
>> I am not able to think of any other parallel processing use case that
>> would be useful to built on top of YARN. I though of a lot of use cases
>> that would be beneficial when run in parallel , but again ,we can do those
>> using map only jobs in MR.
>> Can someone tell me a scenario , where a application can utilize Yarn
>> features or can be built on top of YARN and at the same time , it cannot be
>> done efficiently using MRv2 jobs.
Rahul Bhattacharjee 2013-06-01, 07:47
John Lilley 2013-06-01, 14:02