-Re: Is anyone using serialized iterators to provide provenance data?
I don't see those as covering the same ground. Let's say I have an Accumulo
table for a given human's genome. As a scientist, I want to apply a set of
filters to create a subset of the genome. This provides a transform from
data-set A to data-set B. Since iterators were used for the transform, we
could serialize the set of iterators used by the transformation. Both
data-sets are immutable. Think git for data-sets.
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this might relate to ACCUMULO-1397, in the form of providing a
> mechanism to specify iterator profiles, or ACCUMULO-415.
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:51 PM, David Medinets
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you apply a set of iterators to one table to produce another, it seems
> > possible to serialize the iterator stack alongside the new table in some
> > catalog to provide provenance. The assumption is that the tables are
> > immutable, I think. Is anyone doing this or has anyone thought about
> > so? Just curious and wanted to ask before I forgot about the idea.