Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> hadoop versions and HBase 0.92 Was: proper pace for JIRA integration


Copy link to this message
-
Re: hadoop versions and HBase 0.92 Was: proper pace for JIRA integration
Hi Ted,

I have nothing further to add.

Thanks to Roman for the perspective.
 
Best regards,
   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
----- Original Message -----
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 3:37 PM
> Subject: hadoop versions and HBase 0.92 Was: proper pace for JIRA integration
>
> Roman/Andy:
> I think the following discussion is very helpful.
>
> Please keep the on-going discussion to public.
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>  Andrew,
>>
>>  On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>  wrote:
>>  > Yeah, DoA is harsh, when I meant more like "abandoned at
> release".
>>  Similar to 0.21.
>>  >
>>  > Well that is my question, really. Is it?
>>
>>  Personally, I don't remember 0.21 being deployed anywhere in
>>  production (I could be
>>  wrong and would love to be corrected). With 0.22 there's at least EBay
>>  and one other
>>  reasonably big shop I know of that will be deploying it to production
>>  clusters.
>>  Thus, IMHO, they are not similar in that regard.
>>
>>  > We've heard that CDH4 is going to be start from something a lot
> closer
>>  to 0.23 than 0.22,
>>  > that Hortonworks is committed to 0.23. It seems 0.23 is the future,
> and
>>  a RC may be
>>  > happening as early as the end of this year, i.e. in the next month or
> so.
>>  >
>>  > Given recent history and the above described commitments, I think
> there
>>  is confusion about where/if 0.22 fits in.
>>  > People will work on what inspires them, but it seems the center of
>>  gravity has already moved beyond 0.22.
>>  > Is that a fair statement?
>>
>>  From my point of view, it will be fair to call 0.22 a *stable* stop
>>  gap release before
>>  0.23 matures. How long does the window of exposure for 0.22 last? Your
>>  guess is
>>  as good as mine. At times I wish that HDFS and MR2 release work in .23
>>  were done
>>  as different projects. Take it with a grain of salt, but I believe
>>  that MR2 will be holding
>>  .23 back in terms of  deployment.
>>
>>  So here's the bottom line the way I see it: the worst that could
>>  happen to an OS project
>>  is to be a hostage of a NEXT great thing (KDE and other examples come to
>>  mind
>>  readily). When Hadoop 0.23 will be stable enough -- it will surely
>>  obsolete .22, in
>>  the meantime we will have .22 to fill the gap.
>>
>>  > Then I'm sure the eBay guys will have that interest. :-)
>>
>>  That's the beauty of Open Source. On the other hand, since you asked a
>>  "community"
>>  question I was compelled to point out that there would be a reasonably
>>  sizable community
>>  running .22/HBase.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  Roman.
>>
>>  P.S. Sorry for making this thread longer than it had to be. Lets take
>>  it off-list from this reply on.
>>
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB