I think you could do it manually by looking up all the different
regions and starting a separate scan for each region. Not quite as
handy as the built-in multi get, but essentially the same.
Of course, that leaves the question of processing-- If you're
processing it in a single-threaded environment, HBase is unlikely to
be the bottleneck. If your sending each scan to multiple processors,
this could be a significant speedup.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Bertrand Dechoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you talking about as coprocessor or MapReduce input? If it is the first
> then it is up to you (the client). If it is the latter I am not sure that
> -if scans were changed to be parallel (assuming they are sequential now)-
> the whole job would be noticeably faster. But I am interested in an answer
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:56 AM, Mohit Anchlia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> Is there a way to execute multiple scans in parallel like get?
> Bertrand Dechoux