Varun Sharma
2013-03-14, 15:48
Ted Yu
2013-03-14, 16:08
Varun Sharma
2013-03-14, 17:42
Varun Sharma
2013-03-18, 20:20
Ted Yu
2013-03-18, 20:28
lars hofhansl
2013-03-18, 21:48
Varun Sharma
2013-03-18, 21:57
-
Patch for HBase 7295Varun Sharma 2013-03-14, 15:48
Hi,
Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
look ?
Thanks
Varun
Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
look ?
Thanks
Varun
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295Ted Yu 2013-03-14, 16:08
The issue was logged against 0.94.3
In your production, what version are you using ?
Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
cleanly, respectively ?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
> there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
> look ?
>
> Thanks
> Varun
>
In your production, what version are you using ?
Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
cleanly, respectively ?
Thanks
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
> there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
> look ?
>
> Thanks
> Varun
>
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295Varun Sharma 2013-03-14, 17:42
Hi Ted,
We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
not applying cleanly against trunk.
Thanks
Varun
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>
> In your production, what version are you using ?
>
> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
> cleanly, respectively ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
> > look ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Varun
> >
>
We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
not applying cleanly against trunk.
Thanks
Varun
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>
> In your production, what version are you using ?
>
> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
> cleanly, respectively ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
> > look ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Varun
> >
>
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295Varun Sharma 2013-03-18, 20:20
Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
> not applying cleanly against trunk.
>
> Thanks
> Varun
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>>
>> In your production, what version are you using ?
>>
>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
>> cleanly, respectively ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
>> > look ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Varun
>> >
>>
>
>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
> not applying cleanly against trunk.
>
> Thanks
> Varun
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>>
>> In your production, what version are you using ?
>>
>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
>> cleanly, respectively ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take a
>> > look ?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Varun
>> >
>>
>
>
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295Ted Yu 2013-03-18, 20:28
I commented on the JIRA.
Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
>> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
>> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
>> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
>> not applying cleanly against trunk.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Varun
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>>>
>>> In your production, what version are you using ?
>>>
>>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
>>> cleanly, respectively ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
>>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
>>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take
>>> a
>>> > look ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Varun
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
>> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
>> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
>> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
>> not applying cleanly against trunk.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Varun
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>>>
>>> In your production, what version are you using ?
>>>
>>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
>>> cleanly, respectively ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
>>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
>>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take
>>> a
>>> > look ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Varun
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295lars hofhansl 2013-03-18, 21:48
I commented on the jira. Not sure the fix is correct. Let's take the discussion there.
________________________________
From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Patch for HBase 7295
I commented on the JIRA.
Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
>> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
>> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
>> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
>> not applying cleanly against trunk.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Varun
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>>>
>>> In your production, what version are you using ?
>>>
>>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
>>> cleanly, respectively ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
>>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
>>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take
>>> a
>>> > look ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Varun
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
________________________________
From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:28 PM
Subject: Re: Patch for HBase 7295
I commented on the JIRA.
Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
>> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly against
>> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
>> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3 was
>> not applying cleanly against trunk.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Varun
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
>>>
>>> In your production, what version are you using ?
>>>
>>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
>>> cleanly, respectively ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back and
>>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
>>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone take
>>> a
>>> > look ?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Varun
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
-
Re: Patch for HBase 7295Varun Sharma 2013-03-18, 21:57
Sure, thanks, lars !
I am retouching this issue after a while so my memory is a little vague on
it and I may have missed something there...
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I commented on the jira. Not sure the fix is correct. Let's take the
> discussion there.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2013 1:28 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Patch for HBase 7295
>
> I commented on the JIRA.
> Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ted,
> >>
> >> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
> >> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly
> against
> >> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
> >> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3
> was
> >> not applying cleanly against trunk.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Varun
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
> >>>
> >>> In your production, what version are you using ?
> >>>
> >>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
> >>> cleanly, respectively ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back
> and
> >>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> >>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone
> take
> >>> a
> >>> > look ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> > Varun
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
I am retouching this issue after a while so my memory is a little vague on
it and I may have missed something there...
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:48 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I commented on the jira. Not sure the fix is correct. Let's take the
> discussion there.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 18, 2013 1:28 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Patch for HBase 7295
>
> I commented on the JIRA.
> Another +1 is needed before your patch can be checked in.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could someone take a look ? Thanks !
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ted,
> >>
> >> We are using HBase 0.94.3 in production - however this should primarily
> >> affect the HBase Client. I checked that the patch applies cleanly
> against
> >> 0.94. I ran "mvn test" but its taking forever (over an hour now) but not
> >> seeing any failures yet. I have uploaded the v4 for trunk since the v3
> was
> >> not applying cleanly against trunk.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Varun
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The issue was logged against 0.94.3
> >>>
> >>> In your production, what version are you using ?
> >>>
> >>> Can you validate that the latest 0.94 / trunk patches on 7295 apply
> >>> cleanly, respectively ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Could someone take a look at 7295 - I attached a patch a while back
> and
> >>> > there was some discussion. Then it dropped off my plate. We have been
> >>> > running the patch for a long time now, in production. Can someone
> take
> >>> a
> >>> > look ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks
> >>> > Varun
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
