Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Zookeeper >> mail # dev >> Proposal: create a separate ZooKeeper release artifact for recipes

Copy link to this message
Re: Proposal: create a separate ZooKeeper release artifact for recipes
I'm sure there is. But I still stand behind the idea of this as an incubator.
Personally, I am not comfortable endorsing this project as the
be-all-end-all zk client. I think we have to be truly comfortable
supporting it as such if we pull it in as part of our code base, no
matter how tangential we might keep it, and I for one am not on board
with that just yet. Maybe in a few months if we saw a significant
uptick in adoption by our user base, we could evaluate it as such. But
right now I think it's premature to take this code base on.


On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IF we are talking analogies, there are SolR / Lucene, Mahout Collections /
> Mahout, PiggyBank / Pig that go the other way.  You will be able to add
> many more as well, starting with Lucene / Hadoop and so on.
> My thought is that it really has to do most with common development
> interests.  The projects that became TLP's had divergent communities and
> those that stuck together had more overlapping communities.  In this case,
> I see lots of overlap because I have interests on both sides.  Other people
> may care only about one side or the other, but I suspect that we actually
> have a spectrum rather than a dichotomy.
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I vote incubator. It seems to be to zookeeper as hector is to cassandra.
>> From my phone
>> On Dec 5, 2011 7:13 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > On 12/5/11 3:29 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Initially, n would be a very small number (possibly even 0, but that
>> > seems
>> > > >unnecessary).  The number could increase over time.
>> > >
>> > > We'd want 1 (me) at minimum. 2 would be better as I have a backup here
>> at
>> > > Netflix.
>> >
>> >
>> > Let's see what the rest of the ZK world says.
>> >