Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase >> mail # user >> Re: [ANNOUNCE] HBase 0.94.9 is available for download


+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 08:22
+
Ted Yu 2013-07-06, 08:32
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 08:35
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 16:09
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [ANNOUNCE] HBase 0.94.9 is available for download
For option #1, some users would obtain 0.94.9 from download site yet others
would obtain from maven repo.
This means that there would be inconsistency among 0.94.9 users down the
road.

Is this desirable ?

On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 9:09 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I am still leaning towards #1. There is no bug, just one jira missing from
> the maven release for two weeks or so (until 0.94.10 is released).
>
>
> HBASE-8656 has no functional implications but fixes a condition where
> sometimes handler threads are leaked with secure HBase only.
> Furthermore this issue has existing since 0.94.0.
>
> So unless I hear very strong support/arguments for option #2 or #3 below,
> I'll simply leave this as is.
>
> -- Lars
>
> ________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; hbase-user <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, July 6, 2013 1:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] HBase 0.94.9 is available for download
>
>
> Looks like option #2 is better.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Jul 6, 2013, at 1:22 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So I cannot fix the maven release after the fact. So we have the
> following options:
> >
> > 1. Leave it as is. Tags/tar have HBASE-8656, but the maven release
> misses that that one fix; and release 0.94.10 soon.
> > 2. Release 0.94.9.1, which would be identical to 0.94.9 (except for the
> release name change in pom.xml).
> > 3. Re-release 0.94.9 with HBASE-8656 removed. That way tags and tar ball
> would be the same as the maven release.
> >
> > Not sure which one I'd prefer. Probably #1 followed by #2.
> >
> > -- Lars
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Aditya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; lars hofhansl <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: hbase-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, July 5, 2013 9:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] HBase 0.94.9 is available for download
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks Lars.
> >
> >
> > It looks like HBASE-8656, though part of the tarball, is not included in
> 0.94.9 tag.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Aditya...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:58 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The HBase Team is pleased to announce the immediate release of HBase
> 0.94.9.
> >> Download it from your favorite Apache mirror [1].
> >>
> >> As usual, all previous 0.92.x and 0.94.x releases can upgraded to
> 0.94.9 via a rolling upgrade without downtime, intermediary versions can be
> skipped.
> >>
> >> 0.94.9 is the current stable release of HBase. It fixes the following
> 26 issues:
> >>     [HBASE-8453] - TestImportExport failing again due to configuration
> issues
> >>     [HBASE-8494] - TestRemoteAdmin#testClusterStatus should not assume
> 'requests' does not change
> >>     [HBASE-8522] - Archived hfiles and old hlogs may be deleted
> immediately by HFileCleaner, LogCleaner in HMaster
> >>     [HBASE-8555] - FilterList correctness may be affected by random
> ordering of sub-filter(list)
> >>     [HBASE-8590] - [0.94] BlockingMetaScannerVisitor should check for
> parent meta entry while waiting for split daughter
> >>     [HBASE-8639] - Poor performance of htable#getscanner in
> multithreaded environment due to DNS.getDefaultHost() being called in
> ScannerCallable#prepare()
> >>     [HBASE-8640] - ServerName in master may not initialize with the
> configured ipc address of hbase.master.ipc.address
> >>     [HBASE-8655] - Backport to 94 - HBASE-8346(Prefetching .META. rows
> in case only when useCache is set to true)
> >>     [HBASE-8656] - Rpc call may not be notified in SecureClient
> >>     [HBASE-8671] - Per-region WAL breaks CP backwards compatibility in
> 0.94 for non-enabled case
> >>     [HBASE-8684] - Table Coprocessor can't access external HTable by
> default
> >>     [HBASE-8700] - IntegrationTestBigLinkedList can fail due to random
> number collision
+
Azuryy Yu 2013-07-06, 08:02
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 08:04
+
lars hofhansl 2013-07-06, 08:07
+
Azuryy Yu 2013-07-06, 08:37