Please could you specify the JIRA tracking this linger change ?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fyi That linger change was included in 3.3.4 and 3.4.1.
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> which version of the server are you using. this sounds like the linger
>> bug that was fixed a while back.
>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> That is not what we would expect from the cluster. What do the server logs show?
>>> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:13 PM, 朱晨杰 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hi, everyone:
>>>> I'm now using Zookeeper as my service server. There are 3 Zookeeper
>>>> servers, then I use 3 pc connect to them. On each pc there are 20 processes
>>>> connect to zookeeper cluster so there are totally 60 connection. I
>>>> terminate 20 processes on one pc simultaneously, then I find the status of
>>>> all the 60 connection turned to "disconnected". After a while, the living
>>>> 40 process start re-connect to zookeeper, but they all become "expired". I
>>>> thought the connetion of one client would not affect others, but the result
>>>> shows it does affect.
>>>> So I want to ask: Does it cost a lot for zookeeper to deal with a lost
>>>> connnetion? And if too much connection lost at the same time will cause
>>>> zookeeper deny of service?
>>>> Zhu Chenjie
>>>> Zhejiang University, China