In issue HDFS-1839 , is it safe to remove the endcheckpoint() call made at
doCheckpoint after namenode.rollfsimage() ?? As Konstantin Shvachko pointed
out , this call seems to be redundant .. Or is there any other impact if we
remove this ?

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. huawei_logo
Solitaire
Domlur
Bangalore
www.huawei.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
HUAWEI, which
is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any
use of the
information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
total or partial
disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
intended
recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!

 

I don't see any other impacts. Could you submit a patch?
--Konstantin

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Sreehari G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>  In issue HDFS-1839 , is it safe to remove the endcheckpoint() call made at
> doCheckpoint after namenode.rollfsimage() ?? As Konstantin Shvachkopointed out , this call seems to be redundant .. Or is there any other
> impact if we remove this ?
>
> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. [image: huawei_logo]
>
>
> Solitaire
> Domlur
> Bangalore
> www.huawei.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from
> HUAWEI, which
> is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above.
> Any use of the
> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to,
> total or partial
> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the
> intended
> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
>